Jaipur Rural

Parliament Election 2019 GEN

Winner Bharatiya Janata Party

Col. Rajyavardhan Rathore

Bharatiya Janata Party

Victory Margin
393,171
Margin %
30.80%
Total Electors
1,897,332
Votes Polled
1,276,693
Turnout
67.80%
Valid Votes
1,267,342
NOTA Votes
9,351
Candidates
8
Top Candidates (Votes)
Constituency Information
State
Rajasthan
Constituency Number
325
Male Electors
998,429
Female Electors
898,897
Male Voters
N/A
Female Voters
N/A
Poll Date
N/A
Result Date
N/A
NOTA Percentage
0.50%
All Candidates

Complete list of candidates who contested from this constituency

#1
Col. Rajyavardhan Rathore

Bharatiya Janta Party

820,132
64.20%
Male
#2
Krishna Poonia

Indian National Congress

426,961
33.40%
Male
#3
Virender Singh Bidhuri

Bahujan Samaj Party

7,976
0.60%
Male
#4
Vinod Sharma

Independent

4,146
0.30%
Male
#5
Rajendra Kumar

Ambedkarite Party Of India

3,800
0.30%
Male
#6
Ramsingh Kasana

Independent

1,834
0.10%
Male
#7
Ram Niwas Nenawat Meghawal

Bharat Rakshak Party (Democratic)

1,259
0.10%
Male
#8
Banwari Lal Meena

Independent

1,234
0.10%
Male
Position Candidate Name Party Votes Vote %
1 Col. Rajyavardhan Rathore Bharatiya Janta Party 820,132 64.20%
2 Krishna Poonia Indian National Congress 426,961 33.40%
3 Virender Singh Bidhuri Bahujan Samaj Party 7,976 0.60%
4 Vinod Sharma Independent 4,146 0.30%
5 Rajendra Kumar Ambedkarite Party Of India 3,800 0.30%
6 Ramsingh Kasana Independent 1,834 0.10%
7 Ram Niwas Nenawat Meghawal Bharat Rakshak Party (Democratic) 1,259 0.10%
8 Banwari Lal Meena Independent 1,234 0.10%
Related Results

Explore more election data

Other Constituencies in Rajasthan
Jaipur Rural in Other Years
Frequently Asked Questions

Col. Rajyavardhan Rathore (Bharatiya Janata Party) won the Jaipur Rural Lok Sabha seat in 2019.

The margin was 393,171 votes (30.80%%).

The voter turnout in Jaipur Rural for the 2019 Lok Sabha election was 67.80%%.

8 candidates contested from Jaipur Rural constituency in the 2019 Lok Sabha election.

Jaipur Rural is a Lok Sabha constituency in Rajasthan.